facebook twitter RSS
Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • History
    • Board of Directors
    • Board of Advisors
    • Contact Us
    • Close
  • Fellows
    • E. Christian Brugger, D.Phil. – E. Christian Brugger is a Senior Fellow of Ethics and Director of the Fellows Program at the Culture of Life Foundation in Washington, D.C. and the J. Francis Cardinal Stafford Professor of Moral Theology at St. John Vianney Theological Seminary in Denver, Colorado. He has Master degrees in moral theology and moral philosophy from Seton Hall, Harvard and Oxford Universities and received his D.Phil. (Ph.D.) in Christian ethics from Oxford in 2000.  Christian has published over 200 articles in scholarly and popular periodicals on topics in bioethics, sexual ethics, natural law theory, as well as the interdisciplinary field of psychology and Christian anthropology.  He lives on a farm in Evergreen, Colorado, with his wife Melissa and five children.
    • Helen Alvaré, J.D. – Helen Alvaré, J.D. is Honorary Fellow in Law at the Culture of Life Foundation.   Helen is an Associate Professor of Law at the George Mason University School of Law in Arlington, Virginia where she teaches and publishes in the areas of property law, family law, and Catholic social thought. Professor Alvaré serves as Consultor for the Pontifical Council for the Laity, Senior Fellow at the Witherspoon Institute where she chairs the Conscience Protection Task Force, is President of the Chiaroscuro Foundation and most recently Editor and Co-Author of Breaking Through: Catholic Women Speak for Themselves.From 2000 to Spring 2008, Professor Alvare taught at the Catholic University Columbus School of Law. Professor Alvare also lectures widely in the United States and Europe on matters concerning marriage, family and respect for human life. She is a consultant to ABC News and to the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) Marriage and Pro-Life Committees. In 2008, Pope Benedict XVI named Professor Alvare a Consultor to the Pontifical Council for the Laity.From 1987-2000, Professor Alvare was an attorney with the USCCB’s General Counsel Office and director of information and planning for the Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities. In these positions, she testified before the…
    • Jennifer Kimball Watson, Be.L. – Jennifer Kimball Watson joined Culture of Life Foundation as Executive Director in November of 2007. She is an Adjunct Professor of Bioethics at the Ave Maria School of Law in Naples, F.L.. Previous to her work with the Culture of Life Foundation Jennifer was a Wilbur Fellow of the Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal located in Michigan. Jennifer earned a Licentiate in Bioethics from the Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum School of Bioethics in Rome.  Her prior undergraduate studies were in International Administration and Government Policy at the Evergreen State College in Washington State.Jennifer’s areas of specialization include Eugenics in Artificial Reproductive Technologies, Heterologous Adoption and Transfer of Embryos, The Womb in Reproductive Technologies, and the Role and Significance of The Medical Act. She interviews with National Conservative and Christian Radio Syndicates as well as several foreign and secular reporters. Jennifer has spoken on the dignity of women and women’s social issues to various audiences since 1999 and has spent several years in advocacy work with various international organizations in the field of life sciences. From 2000 to 2006 she recruited and coordinated grass-roots social policy efforts that consisted of a public and private sector network of professionals and academics…
    • Margaret Datiles Watts, J.D. – Margaret Datiles Watts, J.D., is Culture of Life Foundation’s Associate Fellow in Law. Maggie is member of Washington, D.C. and Maryland bar associations.  She holds a B.A. in Philosophy (Phi Beta Kappa and Magna Cum Laude) and a Certificate in Classical Philosophy from the University Honors Program at The Catholic University of America. She earned a Juris Doctorate from Columbus School of Law at The Catholic University of America, where she served as a Research Fellow at CUA Law’s Marriage Law Project. She also studied Roman Law and EU Law at Magdalene College, University of Oxford, England.A former Fellow and Staff Counsel for Americans United for Life, Datiles co-authored an amicus curiae brief to the Supreme Court of the United States in the landmark partial birth abortion case, Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood, et al., companion case to Gonzales v. Carhart (2007). She also advised legislators, policy groups and the media (radio and newspapers) on abortion and bioethics laws and drafted pro-life model legislation.Her areas of research and/or publication include legal issues surrounding abortion, government funding restrictions for abortion, contraception, healthcare rights of conscience, stem cell research, artificial reproductive technology, population decline, physician-assisted suicide, euthanasia, and same-sex marriage.She currently publishes articles…
    • William E. May – William E. May is Senior Research Fellow of the Culture of Life Foundation and emeritus Michael J. McGivney Professor of Moral Theology at the John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family at The Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., where he taught the academic years from 1991 through 2008 after teaching for 20 years at The Catholic University of America. He is the author of more than a dozen books. The 2nd edition of his Catholic Bioethics and the Gift of Human Life was published by Our Sunday Visitor (2008), and a substantively revised 3rd edition is scheduled for publication in 2013. In 2003 Our Sunday Visitor published a revised and expanded edition of his Introduction to Moral Theology. Among his other books are: Marriage: The Rock on Which the Family Is Built (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1995; 2nd revised edition, 2009)); and, with Ronald Lawler OFM Cap and Joseph Boyle, Catholic Sexual Ethics (rev. and enlarged ed. Huntington, IN: Our Sunday Visitor, 1998; 2nd rev. edition, 1998; a 3rd edition, substantively revised by May alone, was published in 2011); Theology of the Body: Genesis and Growth (Boston: Pauline Books & Media, 2010) He has published more…
    • Frank J. Moncher, Ph.D. – Dr. Frank Moncher received his Ph.D. in Clinical-Community Psychology from the University of South Carolina in 1992, following which he spent several years on faculty of the Medical College of Georgia, with a focus on Adolescent Intensive Services. In 2000 he moved to the Washington, DC area to teach at a graduate school of psychology which had a mission of integrating the science of psychology in the context of the Catholic Christian view of the human person. Concurrent with this, over the past 12 years he has consulted with 11 different religious orders and 4 dioceses to provide psychological evaluations of aspirants and candidates, as well as consulting with different diocesan marriage tribunals.His research interests include the integration of Catholic thought into psychotherapy, child and family development issues, and integrated models of assessment of candidates for the priesthood and religious life. Frank is published in Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, Adolescence, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Edification, and the Journal of Psychology and Christianity, as well as contributing to several book chapters on children, families, and religious issues.Since 2010, Dr. Moncher has worked for the Diocese of Arlington and Catholic Charities as a psychologist and consultant.  His…
    • Steve Soukup – Fellow in Culture and Economy Steve Soukup is the Vice President and Publisher of The Political Forum, an “independent research provider” that delivers research and consulting services to the institutional investment community, with an emphasis on economic, social, political, and geopolitical events that are likely to have an impact on the financial markets in the United States and abroad. Mr. Soukup has followed politics and federal regulatory policy for the financial community since coming to Washington in 1996, when he joined Mark Melcher at the award-winning Washington-research office of Prudential Securities. While at Prudential, he was part of the Washington team that placed first in Institutional Investor magazine’s annual analyst survey for eight years in a row. Mr. Soukup left Prudential with Mr. Melcher to join Lehman Brothers in the fall of 2000 and stayed there for two years, before leaving early in 2003 to become a partner at The Political Forum. While at Lehman, Mr. Soukup authored macro-political commentary and followed policy developments in the Natural Resources sector group, focusing on agriculture and energy policy. He also headed Lehman’s industry-leading analysis of asbestos litigation reform efforts. At The Political Forum, Mr. Soukup was initially the editor and junior partner,…
    • Dr. Pilar Calva, M.D. – Dr. Calva is a medical doctor specializing in Human Genetics with a Cytogenetics subspecialty from The University of Paris, France. In Paris, she was the under-study to the world-renowned Professor Jerome Lejeune, who is considered by some to be the father of modern genetics. In 1958, Lejeune discovered that an extra 21st chromosome is responsible for Down syndrome, or Trisomy 21. Lejeune dedicated his life tirelessly and unfailingly to defend the unborn, especially those with Down syndrome, testifying before scientific conferences and lawmakers. He was appointed by Pope John Paul II as the first President of the Pontifical Academy for Life. In Dr. Calva’s own words: When I arrived in France, I lived a life divided between faith and reason. I thought that from Monday to Saturday, I put on my white coat for my scientific tasks, and Sunday was the day I took off the white coat, put on my crucifix and dedicated myself to my religious duties. Professor Lejeune truly converted me, making me see that one can wear the white coat and the cross, at the same time. That is, one can fly with the wing of faith and the wing of reason. Inspired by the life…
    • Elyse M. Smith – Elyse M. Smith is an associate attorney with a northern Virginia law firm working in nonprofit and church law, estate planning, and civil litigation. Ms. Smith graduated magna cum laude from Ave Maria School of Law in Naples, Florida, where she served on Law Review and was published in the Ave Maria International Law Journal. She was named “Most Dedicated Editor” for her work on Law Review. Ms. Smith earned her bachelor’s degree in Foreign Affairs from the University of Virginia.  
    • Close
  • Life
  • Human Sexuality
  • Marriage & Family
  • Bioethics
  • Religious Liberty
  • Blog
  • Contribute

How are we doing?

Most Viewed Blog Posts

  • The #MeToo Movement And Sexual “Morality”
  • Medical Health Risks of Contraception
  • Facebook And The Intellectual High-Ground
  • Italy Debates The Definition Of “Family”…A Half-Century Too Late
Subscribe
Thanks for signing up!

  >  Issue Briefs  >  Pornography’s Social Cost

Pornography’s Social Cost

Posted: August 4, 2011
By: William E. May
Read  
Print This Post
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn

broken_marriage.jpegIn May, 2010 my article, “The Social Costs of Pornography” was posted on  content/view/639/103 . It summarized a 61 page booklet, The Social Costs of Pornography: Findings and Recommendations published that year by the Witherspoon Institute.. Later in 2010 the Witherspoon Institute published a book of over 260 pages entitled The Social Costs of Pornography: A Reader, with a Foreword by Jean Bethke Elshstain and an Introduction by James R. Stoner and Donna M. Hughes.

This article will present some of the extensive evidence provided by the Reader of current scientific studies to show that use of pornography causes terrible harms to millions of people today. Because of the Internet and other new technologies those harms now affect more and more people who can access “hardcore” porn instantly from around the world.

Evidence of Pornography’s Harms Presented by Essays in the Reader’s Part One

1.Norman Doidge’s “Acquiring Tastes and Loves: What Neuroplasticity Teaches Us About Sexuality and Love” shows these harms from the perspective of a scholar who is a psychiatrist, psychoanalyst, and expert on environmental factors in shaping the neurology of the brain. The current porn epidemic graphically shows that sexual tastes can be acquired. “Pornography delivered by high speed Internet connections satisfies the prerequisites for neoplastic change of the brain.” Pornography might seem to be purely instinctive, as pornographers want us to believe. But, Doidge argues, this is not true, because if it were pornography would be unchanging. In reality the content of pornography is dynamic, and changes in its content can lead to the development of acquired tastes. Thirty years ago “hardcore” pornography meant the presentation of sexual intercourse between two aroused partners, displaying their genitals, while “softcore” meant pictures of women in various states of undress, baring their breasts. But hardcore has evolved. Today it is dominated by the “sadomasochistic themes of forced sex, ejaculations on women’s faces, and angry anal sex, all involving scripts fusing sex with hatred and humiliation.” And today the comparatively tame softcore pictures of bygone years now appear everywhere– “in the pornification of everything, including television, rock videos, soap operas, advertisements, etc.”

During the mid-to late 90s Doidge treated or evaluated many men who had acquired a taste for a kind of pornography that troubled or even disgusted them, had disturbing effects on their sexual excitement, their interpersonal relationships, and sexual potency. “While it is usually difficult to get information about private sexual mores, this is not the case with pornography today because its use is increasingly public. This shift is illustrated by the change from calling it ‘pornography’ to the more casual term ‘porn.’”

This has all resulted in today’s cultural situation wherein, as  Stoner and Hughes say in their summary of Doidge’s essay in the Introduction,  “men find that pornographic attitudes have invaded their minds and relationships as well as their computers…..As men’s use of pornography increases they become more desensitized and find it more difficult to achieve satisfaction and intimacy with their wives. Clinical findings reveal that pornography use can become addictive, and users find it very hard to stop even when facing the loss of their relationships, families, and jobs.”

2. Mary Ann Layden’s “Pornography and Violence: A New Look at the Research” is especially illuminating. Layden emphasizes that pornography is a potent teacher of beliefs, behaviors, and attitudes toward women and children, interpersonal relationships, and the meaning of human sexuality.

Contemporary pornography, especially that readily accessible to adolescents and adults (and even children) on the Internet, reinforces the “rape myth”  that women themselves are to blame for their being raped because deep down they want to be raped and ask to be raped by dressing and acting provocatively. Research she cites shows that “males shown imagery of a woman aroused by sexual violence and then shown  pornography that involved rape were more likely than those who hadn’t [been shown the pornography] to say that the rape victim suffered less, that she enjoyed it, and that women in general enjoy rape.” And this is precisely what pornographers want males to believe and act on.

A meta-analysis of 33 studies showed that exposure to either violent or non-violent pornography increases acts of sexual violence. Taken as a whole, they indicate that many kinds of pornography and frequent use of pornography are connected to both violent fantasies and actual violent sexual assaults, with violent pornography having the greatest negative effect.
Studies also show that male porn users end up viewing women simply as objects for their gratification; they become emotionally detached from others, concerned only to satisfy their lustful desires. As a result of this the women whom they abuse, whether prostitutes or their wives, suffer severe depression, guilt feelings, and similar harms.

Evidence of Pornography’s Harms Detailed in the Reader’s “Appendix: Selected Recent Findings”

Here is a sampling of the findings in the 66 studies (the names of the studies are italicized) summarized in the Appendix.

The Butner Study Redux: a report of the incidence of hands-on child victimization by child pornography offenders. This showed that almost 98%  of persons imprisoned for child pornography who entered therapy without known hands-on victim offenses actually had child hands-on victims.

Linking male use of the sex industry to controlling behaviors in violent relationship. According to this, male domestic violence offenders who used pornography and frequented strip joints use more controlling behaviors, and engage in more sexual abuse, stalking, and marital rape than do males who do not do so.

Use of pornography and self-reported engagement among adolescents. This demonstrated that reading and viewing pornographic material (magazines, comics, films, and videos) was linked to  forced sex for both male and female adolescents. It also showed that male users of porn were more likely to become the victims of forced sex, i.e., sodomy.

Adult social bonds and use of internet pornography. This showed that “persons ever having an extra-marital affair were 3.18 times more apt to have used cybernet porn than ones who had not had affairs.”

The use of sexually explicit stimuli by rapists, child molesters, and non-offenders. This showed that sex offenders have a high rate of use of hard-core pornography: child molesters (67%), rapists (83%), incest offenders (29%) whereas only a minority (13%) of non-offenders used this material. The pornography used was often adult and consensual in nature.

The three essays in Part Two give reasoned arguments showing that pornography is intrinsically evil and therefore harmful. Essays in Part Three show that, since current constitutional doctrine protects pornography, its opponents must change public opinion and develop political strategies to change the legal climate.

 (c) 2011 Culture of Life Foundation.  Reproduction granted with attribution.

This entry was posted in Issue Briefs by William E. May. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
William E. May
How are we doing?

Most Viewed Blog Posts

  • The #MeToo Movement And Sexual “Morality”
  • Medical Health Risks of Contraception
  • Facebook And The Intellectual High-Ground
  • Italy Debates The Definition Of “Family”…A Half-Century Too Late
Subscribe
Thanks for signing up!

Culture of Life Foundation
Contribute

About Us

  • Mission and Vision
  • History
  • Questions and Testimonials
  • Board of Directors
  • Board of Advisors
  • CLF Team

Issue Briefs

  • Most Viewed
  • Subscribe
  • Life
  • Human Sexuality
  • Marriage & Family
  • Bioethics
  • Religious Liberty

CLF Fellows Program

  • About the Fellows Program
  • Jennifer Kimball Watson, Be.L.
  • E. Christian Brugger, D.Phil.
  • Helen Alvaré, J.D.
  • Margaret Datiles Watts, J.D.
  • William E. May
  • Frank J. Moncher, Ph.D.
  • Steve Soukup
  • Dr. Pilar Calva, M.D.
  • Elyse M. Smith

Person and Polis Blog

  • About Steve Soukup
  • Most Viewed

Press Inquiries

P.O. Box 320637
Alexandria, VA 22320
(202) 289-2500
  • communications@cultureoflife.org

Culture of Life Foundation

PO Box 320637
Alexandria, VA 22320
(202) 289-2500

info@cultureoflife.org

Copyright © 2019 Culture of Life Foundation

 

Privacy Policy